Google’s and Microsoft’s chatbots are making up Tremendous Bowl stats

For those who wanted extra proof that GenAI is inclined to creating stuff up, Google’s Gemini chatbot, previously Bard, thinks that the 2024 Tremendous Bowl already occurred. It even has the (fictional) statistics to again it up.

Per a Reddit thread, Gemini, powered by Google’s GenAI fashions of the identical title, is answering questions on Tremendous Bowl LVIII as if the sport wrapped up yesterday — or weeks earlier than. Like many bookmakers, it appears to favor the Chiefs over the 49ers (sorry, San Francisco followers).

Gemini adorns fairly creatively, in at the very least one case giving a participant stats breakdown suggesting Kansas Chief quarterback Patrick Mahomes ran 286 yards for 2 touchdowns and an interception versus Brock Purdy’s 253 working yards and one landing.

It’s not simply Gemini. Microsoft’s Copilot chatbot, too, insists the sport ended and supplies faulty citations to again up the declare. However — maybe reflecting a San Francisco bias! — it says the 49ers, not the Chiefs, emerged victorious “with a last rating of 24-21.”

Copilot Super Bowl

Picture Credit: Kyle Wiggers / TechCrunch

It’s all fairly foolish — and presumably resolved by now, on condition that this reporter had no luck replicating the Gemini responses within the Reddit thread. (I’d be shocked if Microsoft wasn’t engaged on a repair.) However it additionally illustrates the foremost limitations of as we speak’s GenAI — and the hazards of inserting an excessive amount of belief in it.

GenAI fashions haven’t any actual intelligence. Fed an infinite variety of examples normally sourced from the general public net, AI fashions learn the way possible knowledge (e.g. textual content) is to happen based mostly on patterns, together with the context of any surrounding knowledge.

This probability-based method works remarkably properly at scale. However whereas the vary of phrases and their possibilities are possible to lead to textual content that is sensible, it’s removed from sure. LLMs can generate one thing that’s grammatically appropriate however nonsensical, as an example — just like the declare in regards to the Golden Gate. Or they will spout mistruths, propagating inaccuracies of their coaching knowledge. 

It’s not malicious on the LLMs’ half. They don’t have malice, and the ideas of true and false are meaningless to them. They’ve merely discovered to affiliate sure phrases or phrases with sure ideas, even when these associations aren’t correct.

Therefore Gemini’s Tremendous Bowl falsehoods.

Google and Microsoft, like most GenAI distributors, readily acknowledge their GenAI isn’t good and is, in actual fact, inclined to creating errors. However these acknowledgements come within the type of small print I’d argue might simply be missed.

Tremendous Bowl disinformation actually isn’t essentially the most dangerous instance of GenAI going off the rails. That distinction most likely lies with endorsing torture or writing convincingly about conspiracy theories. It’s, nevertheless, a helpful reminder to double-check statements from GenAI bots. There’s an honest likelihood they’re not true.

Leave a Comment